1. Original articles
2. Review articles
5. Practice guidelines
6. Letters to the Editor
7. Perspectives in Nephrology
An inspiring reflection on any aspect of clinical practice
A patient or circumstance who changed or inspire change of practice
A positive reflection on teaching experiences
A paper that changed your practice or thinking
8. Short communications
9. Case reports
10. Meeting reports
Letters to the Editor, Commentaries and Editorials are based on the decision of the Editorial Board.
Practices Guidelines, Consensus Statements - These are considered output of a rigorous process authored by experts in the field hence will not be routinely subjected to an external peer review process. In lieu of peer-review, the author(s), committee or body responsible for the guideline or statements will be asked to sign a form stating that they have approved the manuscript for publication. The Editors reserve the right to submit the manuscript for external peer review if there are issues or controversies surrounding the submitted manuscript.
Meeting Reports – based on the decision of the Editor.
Perspective in Nephrology, Special Articles – depending on the format and content, the decision to submit these articles for peer-review shall be made by the Editorial Board.
- peer-reviewed literature is freely available online without subscription or price barriers, and
- literature is immediately released in open access format (no embargo period)